IIIT boasts of "research even at the undergraduate level". Good, infact excellent, but i have a question - what purpose does this serve ? P.Anandam (Managing Director, Microsoft Research Bangalore) while giving a talk on MSR Bangalore in IIIT said "As your professors Prof Sangal , Prof PJN will tell you that you cannot survive in a research lab or in other words have a research carrer without a PhD.". What does this mean ? This means that the research we do here at the undergraduate level has no meaning or is of no use if we do not augment it with a PhD (or atleast an MS) degree to help us get a decent research carrer in future. With just a B.Tech degree we can get only (barring a few exceptions) development positions in industry which does not require research anyway. Speaking of getting a PhD degree, we all know that students prefer to go to the states when it comes to higher education in the technical field(i mean a MS or a PhD). A recent survey indicated that in the field of computer science Indian universities produce only 50 PhD's per year compared to around a thousand produced by the US universities. This is what makes scores of students each year work hard to apply to the graduate school at various universities.
Our batch did the same. I will not give you certain statistics: Out of the nine 9 pointers 6 applied for a graduate degree in the US universities. Out of the 6 only 1 student (Sharath) has got multiple offers from among the top 20 colleges. The other 5 have either no calls or calls from their backup universities, nothing from the top 20 colleges. These students have excellent academic record, good courses and projects, decent gre scores, solid recos, almost everything required to secure an admission in the top colleges(not to forget some of them even have publications to their names), then where is the problem ? Ours is not the only batch facing this problem, Krishna Pradeep, gold medalist 2004 batch got an offer from only 1 of the 4 colleges he applied to. Though that 1 was good enough you can noway explain the 3 rejects for as excellent a student as pradeep. And if this is the problem toppers are facing what can the others expect?
One of the reasons our seniors usually quote is that "our institute is not known" and to be frank that is nobodys fault. Name comes with nothing other than time, and no matter how good a university is it needs time to be recognised as a center of excellence.
So whats the solution? To get a solution let us have a look at the only success of our batch, Sharath. How did he get through so many top schools? No doubt he has excellent credentials to his name but the best part of his application was a solid recommendation from Dr. Prasad Jayanthi (those of who do not know, Dr. Prasad Jayanthi is a professor at the university of Darthmouth in the US and has been a visitng faculty at IIIT for the last 2 years, an excellent researcher and very well known in his field). He not only gave Sharath a reco but also spoke to some of the professors at the top universities to take him as a student. Result: Sharath has till date offers from Duke, Brown, Purdue, Dartmouth and Max Planc. Such is the power of a good recommender. If Dr. Prasad Jayanthi can do this for his student can't other IIIT professors. We have great professors in the likes of Prof. PJN, Prof. Sangal, Prof. Kamal, Prof. Jawahar, Prof. Prosenjit , who are excellent researchers and are very well known and respected in their various fields. At the site of the University of Maryland, College Park, "help you in getting a job" is listed as one of the points under the heading "what you can expect from your advisor?". Does the same responsibility not lie with our professors as well? How do they expect people to pursue research as a career if this is the senario. If we look at the MBA results of out batch we have 3 final
selection in IIFT , 2 final selection in FMS , 39 calls from the various IIMS and 6 calls from XLRI. What message do you think is conveyed to the present 2nd or 3rd year students who might be thinking hard on choosing a career.
I think the present third year must take this case with the director and other faculty members. Hope you people have a better experience to write in this regard.
contributed anonymously ...